Every market liberal should be allowed one heterodoxy. Mine is telemarketers. I absolutely hate them. Telemarketers should be rounded up, denied their procedural due process rights, and shipped to Guantanamo Bay to room with Al-Qaeda.
While a solution truly commensurate with the gravity of their offense isn’t on the horizon just yet, the FTC recently announced plans for a national do-not-call list, to which hapless Americans can add their names with a single call to a toll free number. Subsequent calls to such escapees will be federal offenses, hopefully punishable under sentencing guidelines that mention thumbscrews and shock treatments.
At least one telemarketing company has already found religion. WAPO reported on Saturday that CyberRep has cancelled its last cold-calling contract, opting instead to take inbound calls from customers who actually want to speak to them. “It is our belief that the world of outbound telemarketing has a terminal illness and is dying,” a company executive explained.
Remaining perpetrators should convert fast. The national program — and federal penalties — will be online within months. A national “do not call” list is the latest unwarranted federal regulatory intrusion into essentially non-coercive market activity. And I can’t waitâ?¦
UPDATE: The agony of disappointment! I knew it was too good to be true. The Associated Press now reports that the House Energy and Commerce Committee is holding up funding authority for the FTC’s “do not call” registry under heavy lobbying from the Direct Marketing Association. Afraid to oppose the list, Committee members say they want to “study” the plan for the indefinite future.
This calls to mind a recent conversation — related here by Julian — about the power of large organizations to influence the political system in favor of personally beneficial policies, the costs of which are then disbursed among the rest of us. Standard public choice economics, to be sure. The twist? We almost convinced ourselves that widely held corporations may suffer from similar incentive problems. Efficient markets don’t require this type of FTC regulation, you say? Oh, don’t argue with me just now. My inner fascist is squalling in dismay!
{ 6 comments }
Gene 01.06.03 at 4:17 pm
Welcome to the blogosphere…
I feel like telemarketers should at least offer me nude photos of anna kournikova, like my spammers do.
Steven 01.09.03 at 12:21 am
This is an issue that has always bothered me about being a libertarian. I hate telemarketers, and love the idea of a no-call list. But I hate that we have to have some government regulated list to curtail big business(whom I hate as much as big government), but what else can you do? I think this is why caller-id is great.
we’ll see where this goes…
Anony-lib 01.09.03 at 11:23 pm
You mean that we’re only allowed one heterodoxy?
Okay, I confess to being happy about Bloomberg’s smoke-free bars. I have a soft-spot for health fascism…
Bernard Yomtov 01.11.03 at 10:29 pm
Steven,
Harassment by telemarketers is a negative externality, no different in principle than having to breathe air that someone else pollutes to make a profit.
It is wholly appropriate for government to get involved to prevent the telemarketers from imposing these costs on us (or soemhow to force themto compensate us).
Please, no one respond with a rant about how Coase solved all this unless you are prepared to explain, in practical terms, the non-governmental solution to this apparent market failure.
John 01.12.03 at 5:16 pm
Determined hackers could destroy telemarking overnight. What’s holding them back?
Green Card 08.25.04 at 9:09 am
when a mistake, or an incidental, can sometimes green card be noticed and played up in the mix to great effect. green card lottery I’ll attest to all of the above from experience. usa visa I can think of another particularly helpful exercise, dv2006
Comments on this entry are closed.